نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشجوی دکتری آموزش پرستاری، دانشکده پرستاری، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جندی شاپور اهواز، اهواز، ایران

چکیده

زمینه و هدف: ارزشیابی به عنوان یکی از ابزارهای ارتقاء کیفیت این امکان را فراهم می‌سازد تا نقاط قوت و ضعف برنامه­ها مشخص گردند و با تقویت جوانب مثبت و رفع نارسایی در ایجاد تحول و اصلاح گردش کار، گامهای مناسبی برداشته شود. این مطالعه با هدف ارزیابی کیفیت دوره کارشناسی پرستاری بر اساس الگوی سیپ(CIPP) در سال تحصیلی 1395-1394 انجام گرفت.مواد و روش: جمعیت این پژوهش توصیفی – مقطعی شامل60 دانشجوی پرستاری بود. جهت گردآوری داده­ها از پرسشنامه پژوهشگر ساخته استفاده شد. پرسشنامه شامل چهار حیطه­ زمینه، درونداد، فرآیند و برونداد بود. سه وضعیت با نمره صفر تا 50 نامطلوب، 51 تا 100 نسبتا مطلوب و 101 تا 150 مطلوب در نظر گرفته شد. داده­ها با استفاده از آمار توصیفی و استنباطی تجزیه و تحلیل شدند.یافته­ها: از نظر شرکت­کنندگان، وضعیت زمینه، درونداد، فرآیند، برونداد و کلیت دوره کارشناسی پرستاری مطلوب بود. نتایج نشان­ داد که بین چهارحیطه­­ زمینه، درونداد، فرآیند، برونداد ارتباط معنی­داری (01/0= P) وجود داشت و بیشترین نمره در بین عوامل چهارگانه الگوی سیپ مربوط به عامل فرآیند با نمره میانگین79/10±38/49 و کمترین نمره نیز مربوط به عامل برونداد با نمره میانگین05/3±25/14 بود.بحث و نتیجه­گیری: نتایج ارزیابی نهایی دوره کارشناسی پرستاری نشان داد، وضعیت این دوره مطلوب می‌باشد. در جهت نیل به حدکاملاً مطلوب، شایسته است مسئولین دانشکده و دانشگاه بیش از پیش به تقویت عوامل مهم از جمله؛ بازنگری در مواد و محتوای آموزشی، آموزش روشهای تدریس و ارزشیابی و مهارتهای ارتباطی به اساتید توجه نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of the Quality of Undergraduate Nursing Education Program in Ahvaz Based on CIPP Evaluation Model

نویسندگان [English]

  • N Yazdani
  • M Moradi

PhD Candidate in Nursing, Department of Nursing, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

چکیده [English]

Background: Evaluation, as a continuous quality improvement tool, determines the strengths and weaknesses of training programs. The outcome of this evaluation, therefore, can lead to the reinforcement of program’s positive aspects and modification of its insufficiencies. As a result, this study aimed at evaluating the quality of undergraduate nursing education program in Ahvaz in 2015-2016.
Methods:  CIPP model-based-self-constructed questionnaire was administered to 60 nursing students. The questionnaire consisted of two parts. The first part recorded students’ demographic data and the second part evaluated nursing program’s value in terms of content, input, process, and output. Score of the questionnaire categorize into non desirable, desirable, and relatively desirable. Data were analyzed by conducting descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results: According to the participants, the context, input, process, and output of this undergraduate nursing education program were desirable. The results showed that there was a significant relationship between four areas of context, input, process and output (p=0.01). The highest score among the four aspects of CIPP was related to the “process” with an average of 49.38 ± 10.79 and the lowest score was related to the “output” with an average of 14.25±. 3.05.
Conclusion: Although, in general, nursing students were satisfied of this undergraduate program, in order to achieve the optimal result, the school and university officials should try to enhance the quality of the educational programs through revising course materials, upgrading instructors’ knowledge of teaching methods and assessment techniques and improving instructors’ communication skills.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Program Evaluation
  • education
  • Baccalaureate Nursing

  1. Worthen BR. Program Evaluation. In walbergy. Hand Geneva, D. H. (Eds) the International encyclopedia of educational evaluation. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1990. P: 648-62.
  2. Wolf R. Educational evaluation, traslated by Kiamanesh A. Tehran: Academic Publication Center; 1992. P: 231-42. (Persian)
  3. MirzaMohamadi MH, Fooladi H. The Process of Compilation of Goals in the Internal Evaluation of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran: The Control and Evaluation and Development Council of Universities of Medical Sciences; 2000. p: 2. (Persian)
  4. Zhang G, Zeller N, Griffith R, Metcalf D, Williams J, Shea C, et al. Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement. 2011; 15(4): 57-84. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ957107.pdf
  5. Javaheri J, Farajzadegan Z, Shams B, Kelishadi R, Sharifirad Gh, Asgari M, et al. Evaluating Healthy Life Style Education to Adolescents by means of Direct Method, Parents, and Teachers Using CIPP Evaluation Model. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2010; 10(3): 219-228. (Persian)
  6. Waters LD. Outcome Measures of Graduates of a Master’s Degree in Nursing Program: Assessing Congruence of Perceptions of Graduates and Employers. 1987; University of Delaware.
  7. Ehsan poor S. Achieve to Necessary Standards in learning of view Midwifery students of Esfahan Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2006; 6(2): 18-25. (Persian)
  8. Farley DO, Battles JB. Evaluation of the AHRQ Patient Safety Initiative: Framework and Approach. HSR: Health Services Research. 2009; 44(2): 628-45.
  9. Khalkhali R. School comprehensive assessment based on CIPP model: the case of faculty of Petroleum Engineering of Mahmoud Abad. (Msc Thesis) Tehran: Tehran State University, 2000.(Persian)
  10. Tezakori Z, Mazaheri E, Namnebat M, Torabizadeh K, Fathi S, Ebrahimibil F. The Evaluation of PhD Nursing in Iran (Using the CIPP Evaluation Model). J Faculty Nursing & Midwifery. 2010; 12: 44-51. (Persian)
  11. Seyf AA. Educational assessment, evaluation and measurement. Tehran: Dowran publication; 2003. P: 392-401. (Persian)
  12. Stephen Robbins. Organization theory. Translation Alwani S.M and Danaee-fard H. publishing Company, Saffar. 2010. (Persian)
  13. Stufflebeam DL. The Cipp Model for Evaluation. Oregon Program Evaluation Network; 2003. P: 1-68.
  14. Yavuz M. Nursing doctoral education in Turkey. Nurse Educ Today. 2004; 24(7): 553-9.
  15. Ehsanpour S. Achieving Minimum Learning Requirements from the Viewpoints of Midwifery Students in Isfahan School of Nursing and Midwifery. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2006; 6(2): 17-25. (Persian)
  16. Pazargadi M, Azadi Ahmadabadi G. Quality and quality assessment in universities and higher education institutions. Tehran: Boshra; 1387. (Persian)
  17. Leverenz L. Allied Health Education Program Accreditation - what does it mean?. (cited 2014 May 19). Available from: http://www.medical-colleges.net/alliedhealth.htm
  18. Mohebbi N, Akhlaghi F, Yarmohammadian MH, Khoshgam M. Application of CIPP model for evaluating the medical records education course at Master of Science level at Iranian medical sciences universities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 15: 3286-90.
  19. Stufflebeam DL, Shinkfield AJ. Evaluation theory, models, & applications.1st ed. San Francisco: CA: Jossey-Bass; 2007.
  20. Amini R, Vanaki Z, Emamzadeh Ghassemi H. The Validity and Reliability of an Evaluation Tool for Nursing Management Practicum. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2005; 5(2): 23-31.(Persian)
  21. Zhang G, Zeller N, Griffith R, Metcalf D, Williams J, Shea C, et al. Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement. 2011; 15(4): 57.
  22. Heravi-Karimooi M , Anoosheh M, Foroughan M, Sheykhi MT, Hajizadeh E. Designing and determining psychometric properties of the Domestic Elder Abuse Questionnaire. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2010; 15(5): 7-21. (Persian)
  23. Lacasse Y, Godbout C, Series F. Health-related quality of life in obstructive sleep apnoea. European Respiratory Journal. 2002; 19(3): 499-503.
  24. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology. 1975; 28(4): 563-575.
  25. Yaghmaie F. Content validity and its estimation. Journal of Medical Education. 2003; 3(1): 25-28.
  26. Nejat S, Montazeri A, Holakouie Naieni K, Mohammad K, Majdzadeh SR. The World Health Organization quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire: Translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Journal of the School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research. 2006; 4(4): 1-12. (Persian)
  27. Vakili MM, Hidarnia AR, Niknami Sh. Development and Psychometrics of an Interpersonal Communication Skills Scale (A.S.M.A) among Zanjan Health Volunteers. The Journal of Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (HAYAT). 2012; 18(1): 5-19. (Persian)
  28. Hyrkas K, Appelgvist-Schmidlechner K, Oksa L. Validating an instrument for clinical supervision using an expert panel. International Journal of Nursing studies. 2003; 40(6): 619-625.
  29. Scheaffer RL, Mendenhall V, Ott L. Translated by Arghami NR, Sanjari, Bozorgnia A. Elementary Survey sampling. Mshhad: Shahid Beheshti University. 2006. (Persian)
  30. Seyf AA. Educational assessment, evaluation and measurement. Tehran: Dowran publication; 2003. P: 392-401. (Persian)
  31. Salehi R, Jafari N, Golshani M, Haghani F. Determining Educational Objectives and Evaluating Them in Department of Anatomy in Isfahan School of Medicine. IJME. 2011; 10(5): 850-859. (Persian)
  32. Morf CC, Rhodewalt F. Narcissism and Self- Evaluation Maintenance: Explorations in Object Relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1993; 19: 668-76.
  33. Toulabi T, Janani F, Qurbanmohammadi E. The Appropriateness of Educational Programs' Objectives for Professional Needs: The Viewpoints of Khorramabad School of Nursing and Midwifery Graduates. Iranian J Med Educ. 2009; 8(2): 263-73. (Persian)
  34. Phattharayuttawat S, Chantra J, Chaiyasit W, Bannagulrote K, Imaroonrak S, Sumalrot T, et al. An evaluation of the curriculum of a graduate programme in Clinical Psychology. South East Asian J Med Educ. 2009; 3(1): 14-9. 
  35. Khoshgam M. Application of CIPP model for evaluating the medical records education course at Master of Science level at Iranian medical sciences universities. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 15: 3286–90.
  36. Ebily KH, Hodavandy MR. Evaluation of quality of training institutions providing educational services to Iran Khodro Company. Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences. 2004; 34 (1): 99-126.
  37. Saberian M, Asgari M, Asadi AA, Nobahar M, Atashnafas E, Ghods AA, et al. The pattern for internal evaluation of nursing school. Journal of Medicine, Semnan Medical Sciences University Special Medical Education. 2003; 5: 59-68. (Persian)

Allahvirdiyani K. Evaluate Implemented Academic Advisor of Shahed Students in Tehran State Universities Through CIPP Evaluation Model. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 15: 2996–98. (Persian)