مجله علوم پزشکی صدرا

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اخبار و اعلانات

تدوین ابزار غربالگری حرکتی عملکردی در تنیس

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری آسیب شناسی ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه تهران واحد پردیس کیش، تهران، ایران

2 استاد گروه آموزشی طب ورزش، دانشکده تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

3 استاد گروه آسیب شناسی ورزشی و حرکت اصلاحی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: برخلاف اهمیت ابزار غربالگری ‌حرکتی‌عملکردی و نرخ شیوع آسیب ۳۴/۴ آسیب در هر هزار ساعت در رشته‌ی تنیس، تاکنون هیچ پروتکل استاندارد غربالگری‌ حرکتی‌عملکردی اختصاصی رشته‌ی تنیس وجود نداشته است. بنابراین، هدف از مطالعه‌ی حاضر، تدوین ابزار غربالگری ‌حرکتی‌عملکردی در رشته‌ی تنیس است.
روش‌ها: جامعه‌ی آماری برای داده‌های کیفی در این تحقیق شامل همه‌ی کارشناسان و متخصصان حوزه‌ی تنیس اعم از مربیان، مدرسان و فیزیوتراپیست‌ها بود و از بین آن‌ها هجده نفر به‌صورت تصادفی هدفمند به‌عنوان نمونه‌ی آماری انتخاب شدند. جمع‌آوری داده‌ها به‌وسیله‌ی مصاحبه‌ی ساختارمند صورت گرفت. مصاحبه­ها عمدتاً در آکادمی­های تنیس، مطب پزشکان، فیزیوتراپیست­ها و دفتر اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه انجام شد. شش طبقه‌ی آزمون که جامعیت کافی برای دستیابی به ابزار مدّنظر از طریق آن‌ها وجود داشت، طراحی و در پرسش‌نامه‌ی کیفی برای این شش طبقه یازده سؤال تدوین شد. پس از تعریف آزمون‌های اولیه، مصاحبه‌ها کدگذاری گردید و در این مرحله کدگذاری‌ها کنترل و پایایی‌سنجی شدند. دو نمونه از مصاحبه‌ها را کدگذار دیگری، کدگذاری کرده و بعد از تأیید پایایی کدگذاری‌ها، مصاحبه‌ها به‌شکل کامل کدگذاری شدند. مصاحبه‌ها با استفاده از نسخه‌ی یازده نرم‌افزار MAXQDA  تحلیل شدند.
یافته‌ها: نتایج مصاحبه‌ها برای تعیین آزمون‌هایی که صلاحیت قرارگیری در ابزار را دارند، تحلیل شد. در فرایند تحلیل، کدهای اولیه مشخص و درنهایت از 108 آزمون بالقوه موجود، 27 آزمون شناسایی شد.
نتیجه‌گیری: به نظر می‌رسد این ابزار با وجود ویژگی‌هایی نظیر نمره‌گذاری ساده‌ی پایایی و روایی پذیرفته‌شده، امکان اجرا در زمان کوتاه و قابلیت به‌کارگیری در پژوهش‌های مختلف، ابزاری مناسب و کاربردی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Development of a Screening Tool for Functional Movements in Tennis

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sam Kazemi 1
  • Mohammad Hossein Alizadeh 2
  • Hassan Daneshmandi 3

1 Ph.D. of Sports Injury, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Tehran, Kish Campus, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of the Department of Sports Medicine, School of Physical Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Sports Injury and Corrective Movement, faculty of Physical Education, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Despite the importance of the functional movement screening tool and the prevalence rate of 4.34 injuries per 1000 hours in tennis, there is no standard protocol for functional movement screening specific to tennis. Therefore, this study aims to develop a tool for screening functional movements in tennis.
Methods: the statistical population for qualitative data in this research includes all experts and specialists in the field of tennis, including coaches, teachers, and physiotherapists, and 18 of them were randomly selected as a statistical sample. Data collection was done through structured interviews. The interviews were mainly held in tennis academies, doctors' and physiotherapists' offices, and university faculty members' offices. Six classes of tests that were comprehensive enough to achieve the desired tool were designed with eleven questions in the qualitative questionnaire for these six classes. After defining the initial tests, the interviews were coded; then the codings were controlled and verified. Interview data were analyzed through version 11 of MAXQDA.
Results: The results of the interviews were analyzed to determine the qualified tests to be included in the tool.  The analytical process determined initial codes, and finally, 27 tests out of 108 potential tests were identified.
Conclusion: It seems that this tool is suitable and practical with features such as simple scoring, acceptable reliability and validity, the possibility of implementation in a short time, and the ability to be used in various researches.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Prevention
  • Physical Therapists
  • Risk Assessment
  • Tennis
  • Applied Kinesiology
مراجع
  1. Pradas F, Toro-Román V, de la Torre A, Moreno-Azze A, Gutiérrez-Betancur JF, Ortega-Zayas MÁ. Analysis of Specific Physical Fitness in High-Level Table Tennis Players—Sex Differences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(9): 5119.
  2. Buckthorpe M. Optimising the late-stage rehabilitation and return-to-sport training and testing process after ACL reconstruction. Sports Medicine. 2019; 49(7): 1043-1058.
  3. Lemme NJ, Li NY, DeFroda SF, Kleiner J, Owens BD. Epidemiology of Achilles tendon ruptures in the United States: athletic and nonathletic injuries from 2012 to 2016. Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine. 2018; 6(11): 2325967118808238.
  4. Johansson F, Cools A, Gabbett T, Fernandez-Fernandez J, Skillgate E. Association between spikes in external training load and shoulder injuries in competitive adolescent tennis players: the SMASH cohort study. Sports health. 2022; 14(1): 103-110.
  5. Clarsen B, Myklebust G, Bahr R. Development and validation of a new method for the registration of overuse injuries in sports injury epidemiology: the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre (OSTRC) overuse injury questionnaire. British journal of sports medicine. 2013; 47(8): 495-502.
  6. Verhagen E, van Dyk N, Clark N, Shrier I. Do not throw the baby out with the bathwater; screening can identify meaningful risk factors for sports injuries. British journal of sports medicine. 2018; 52(19): 1223-1224.
  7. Fakoor Rashid H, Daneshmandi H. The effects of a 6 weeks corrective exercise program on improving flat foot and static balance in boys. Journal of Practical Studies of Biosciences in Sport. 2013; 1(2): 52-66. doi: 10.22077/jpsbs.2013.37
  8. Nikbin B, Hassan Pour A, Jafari Niya S, Abbasiyan H. A Systematic Review on the Workaholism Researches. Strategic Studies on Youth ans Sports. 2018; 17(40): 75-104.
  9. Dallinga JM, Benjaminse A, Lemmink KA. Which screening tools can predict injury to the lower extremities in team sports? Sports medicine. 2012; 42(9): 791-815.
  10. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function–part 1. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy: NAJSPT. 2006; 1(2): 62.
  11. Wandersman A, Duffy J, Flaspohler P, Noonan R, Lubell K, Stillman L, Saul J. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American journal of community psychology. 2008; 41(3): 171-181.
  12. O’Brien W, Philpott C, Lester D, Belton S, Duncan MJ, Donovan B, Utesch T. Motor competence assessment in physical education–convergent validity between fundamental movement skills and functional movement assessments in adolescence. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2021: 1-14.
  13. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function‐part 1. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2014; 9(3): 396.
  14. Schneiders AG, Davidsson Å, Hörman E, Sullivan SJ. Functional movement screenTM normative values in a young, active population. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2011; 6(2): 75.
  15. Rush AJ, Polatin P, Gatchel RJ. Depression and chronic low back pain: establishing priorities in treatment. Spine, 2000; 25(20): 2566-2571.
  16. Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Brækken IH, Skjølberg A, Olsen OE, Bahr R. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female team handball players: a prospective intervention study over three seasons. Clinical journal of sport medicine. 2003; 13(2): 71-78.
  17. Soligard T, Schwellnus M, Alonso JM, Bahr R, Clarsen B, Dijkstra HP, Engebretsen L. How much is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury. British journal of sports medicine. 2016; 50(17): 1030-1041.
  18. Lin I, Wiles L, Waller R, Goucke R, Nagree Y, Gibberd M, O’Sullivan PP. What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines: systematic review. British journal of sports medicine. 2020; 54(2): 79-86.
  19. De Mey K, Danneels L, Cagnie B, Cools AM. Scapular muscle rehabilitation exercises in overhead athletes with impingement symptoms: effect of a 6-week training program on muscle recruitment and functional outcome. The American journal of sports medicine. 2012; 40(8): 1906-1915.
  20. Sleeper MD, Kenyon LK, Casey E. Measuring fitness in female gymnasts: the gymnastics functional measurement tool. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2012; 7(2): 124.
  21. Gabbe BJ, Finch CF, Wajswelner H, Bennell KL. Predictors of lower extremity injuries at the community level of Australian football. Clinical journal of sport medicine. 2004; 14(2): 56-63.
  22. Steinberg N, Hershkovitz I, Peleg S, Dar G, Masharawi Y, Heim M, Siev-Ner I. Range of joint movement in female dancers and nondancers aged 8 to 16 years: anatomical and clinical implications. The American journal of sports medicine. 2006; 34(5): 814-823.
  23. Tabatabaei SM, Daneshmandi H, Norasteh AA, Sharif Nia H. Functional movement screening tests for the prediction of injuries in volleyball: A qualitative study. Annals of Applied Sport Science. 2018; 6(4): 9-15.
  24. Williams AM, Ericsson KA. Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: Some considerations when applying the expert performance approach. Human movement science. 2005; 24(3): 283-307.
  25. Smith B, Sparkes AC. Interviews: Qualitative interviewing in the sport and exercise sciences. In Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise. Routledge. 2016. p. 125-145.
  26. Agbese OO. Examining the relationship between functional movement screen (FMS) andcomputerized BESS scores and lower extremity injury risk in a cohort of female intercollegiateathletes. University of Delaware. 2016.
  27. Bardenett SM. The Functional MovementScreen normative values and validity in high school Athletes: Can the FMS be used as a predictor of injury? Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015; (3)10: 303-8.
  28. Fox D, O'Malley E, Blake C. Normativedata for the Functional Movement Screen in male Gaelic field sports. Manual therapy. 2014; 15: 194-199.
  29. Parchmann CJ, McBride JM. Relationship between functional movement screen and athletic performance. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2011. 25(12): 3378- 3384.
  30. Chorba RS, et al. Use of a functional movement screening tool to determine
    injury risk in female collegiate athletes. North American journal of sports physical therapy: NAJSPT. 2010. 5(2):
  31. Abrams GD, Per A. Renstrom, and Marc R. Safran. "Epidemiology of musculoskeletal injury in the tennis player." British journal of sports medicine. 2012; 46(7): 492-498.‏
  32. Isyaku H, et al. Media Coverage of Injury Prevalence in Tennis: a Content Analysis of Selected Online Newspapers. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies. 2021; 4: 191-205.‏
  33. Pluim Babette M, Clarsen B, Verhagen E. Injury rates in recreational tennis players do not differ between different playing surfaces. British journal of sports medicine. 2018; 52(9): 611-615.
مجله علوم پزشکی صدرا
دوره 11، شماره 2
فروردین 1402
صفحه 125-138
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار