Sadra Medical Journal

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

Peer Review Process

The role of cognitive abilities and sensation seeking in reasoned and reactive high risk behaviors: The mediational model of future orientation and calculation

Articles in Press

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Psychology, Arsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan, Iran

2 Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch, Shiraz, Iran

3 Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan Branch, Arsanjan, Iran

4 Department of Psychology, Feizoleslam Non-profit Higher Education Institute, Khomeinishahr, Iran

10.30476/smsj.2025.102553.1528

Abstract

Introduction: The present study aimed to investigate the mediating role of cost-benefit estimation, future orientation in the relationship between sensation seeking and cognitive abilities with reasoned and reactive high-risk behaviors.
Methods: The study design was correlational and structural equation modeling. The statistical population of the research was male adolescents in Shiraz city of which 500 were selected using convenience sampling method. The research data collected using questionnaires of cognitive abilities, future orientation, calculation, rational and impulsive risky behavior and the sensation seeking scale. Data was analyzed using the structural equation modeling method and SPSS-26 and AMOS-26.
Results: The findings of the present study showed a significant correlation of all research variables with each other (p<0.001). Reasoned risky behavior had a negative relationship with sensation seeking and a positive relationship with other research variables. The results of structural equation modeling showed that the two variables of cost and benefit estimation and future orientation have a mediating role in the relationship between sensation seeking and reasoned risky behavior (p<0.01). Moreover, these two variables had a mediating role in the relationship between cognitive abilities and reasoned risky behavior (p<0.01).
Conclusion: According to the results of the current research, it seems necessary to pay attention to the role of executive functions, including cost-benefit estimation, future orientation in preventing reactive high-risk behaviors. Paying attention to these two variables can be beneficial in reducing the occurrence of high-risk behaviors in general and in changing the occurrence pattern of these behaviors from reactive to reactive

Keywords

References
  1. Heron M. Deaths: Leading Causes for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017;66(5):1-76.
  2. Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD, Curtin SC, Arias E. Deaths: Final Data for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017;66(6):1-75.
  3. Maslowsky J, Owotomo O, Huntley ED, Keating D. Adolescent Risk Behavior: Differentiating Reasoned And Reactive Risk-taking. J Youth Adolesc. 2019;48(2):243-55.
  4. Romer D, Reyna VF, Satterthwaite TD. Beyond stereotypes of adolescent risk taking: Placing the adolescent brain in developmental context. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017;27:19-34.
  5. Casey BJ, Getz S, Galvan A. The adolescent brain. Dev Rev. 2008;28(1):62-77.
  6. Steinberg L, Graham S, O’Brien L, Woolard J, Cauffman E, Banich M. Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Dev. 2009;80(1):28-44.
  7. Casey BJ, Jones RM. Neurobiology of the adolescent brain and behavior: implications for substance use disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;49(12):1189-201; quiz 285.
  8. Van Leijenhorst L, Zanolie K, Van Meel CS, Westenberg PM, Rombouts SA, Crone EA. What motivates the adolescent? Brain regions mediating reward sensitivity across adolescence. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20(1):61-9.
  9. Reyna VF, Wilhelms EA, McCormick MJ, Weldon RB. Development of Risky Decision Making: Fuzzy-Trace Theory and Neurobiological Perspectives. Child Dev Perspect. 2015;9(2):122-7.
  10. Gibbons FX, Houlihan AE, Gerrard M. Reason and reaction: the utility of a dual-focus, dual-processing perspective on promotion and prevention of adolescent health risk behaviour. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14(Pt 2):231-48.
  11. Reyna VF, Farley F. Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006;7(1):1-44.
  12. Pomery EA, Gibbons FX, Reis-Bergan M, Gerrard M. From willingness to intention: experience moderates the shift from reactive to reasoned behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009;35(7):894-908.
  13. Camchong J, Endres M, Fein G. Decision making, risky behavior, and alcoholism. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;125:227-36.
  14. Harris KM, Duncan GJ, Boisjoly J. Evaluating the role of “nothing to lose” attitudes on risky behavior in adolescence. Social forces. 2002;80(3):1005-39.
  15. Ebrahimi E, Abolmaali Alhosseini K. The Mediating Role of Motivational Structure in the Relationship between Cognitive Abilities and High-Risk Behaviors in Adolescents. Educational Psychology. 2017;13(46):171-90. [Persian].
  16. Mechera-Ostrovsky T, Heinke S, Andraszewicz S, Rieskamp J. Cognitive abilities affect decision errors but not risk preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychon Bull Rev. 2022;29(5):1719-50.
  17. Crone EA, van Duijvenvoorde AC. Multiple pathways of risk taking in adolescence. Developmental Review. 2021;62:100996.
  18. Harden KP, Tucker-Drob EM. Individual differences in the development of sensation seeking and impulsivity during adolescence: further evidence for a dual systems model. Dev Psychol. 2011;47(3):739-46.
  19. Aminimanesh S, Hayat AA, Khanzadeh M, Taheri M. Predictive model of high-risk behaviors in Iranian male adolescents based on psychological motivation. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2021;15(3):1-6.
  20. Sehat SA, Amini Manesh S. Predicting high-risk behaviors in female adolescents based on psychological motivations. Caspian Journal of Pediatrics. 2020;6(2):442-8.
  21. Rezaei Jamaloei H, Mansourifar S, Taheri M, Aminimanesh S. Predictors of opium in adolescents: individual, family and social factors. Scientific Journal of Social Psychology. 2020;8(55):1-14. [Persian].
  22. Hoseini M, Aminimanesh S. Motivational Antecedents of Drug Abuse in Male Adolescents in the City of Shiraz. Community Health Journal. 2018;12(4):29-37. [Persian].
  23. Rosenbloom T. Risk evaluation and risky behavior of high and low sensation seekers. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal. 2003;31(4):375-86.
  24. Barnum TC, Armstrong T. Sensation seeking to marijuana use: Exploring the mediating roles of risk appraisal and social norms. Addict Behav. 2019;92:76-83.
  25. Johnson SR, Blum RW, Cheng TL. Future orientation: a construct with implications for adolescent health and wellbeing. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2014;26(4):459-68.
  26. Stoddard SA, Zimmerman MA, Bauermeister JA. Thinking about the future as a way to succeed in the present: a longitudinal study of future orientation and violent behaviors among African American youth. Am J Community Psychol. 2011;48(3-4):238-46.
  27. Robbins RN, Bryan A. Relationships Between Future Orientation, Impulsive Sensation Seeking, and Risk Behavior Among Adjudicated Adolescents. J Adolesc Res. 2004;19(4):428-45.
  28. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed. New York: Guilford press. 2016.
  29. Nejati V. Cognitive abilities questionnaire: Development and evaluation of psychometric properties. Advances in Cognitive Science. 2013;15(2):11-9. [Persian].
  30. Hoyle RH, Stephenson MT, Palmgreen P, Lorch EP, Donohew RL. Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking. Personality and individual differences. 2002;32(3):401-14.
  31. Chen X, Li F, Nydegger L, Gong J, Ren Y, Dinaj-Koci V, et al. Brief Sensation Seeking Scale for Chinese - Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Assessment. Pers Individ Dif. 2013;54(5):604-9.
  32. Primi C, Narducci R, Benedetti D, Donati M, Chiesi F. Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the Brief Sensation Seeking Scale (BSSS) and its invariance across age and gender. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology. 2011;18(4):231-41.
  33. Kloep M, Guney N, Cok F, Simsek OF. Motives for risk-taking in adolescence: a cross-cultural study. J Adolesc. 2009;32(1):135-51.
  34. Maslowsky J, Buvinger E, Keating DP, Steinberg L, Cauffman E. Cost-Benefit Analysis Mediation of the Relationship Between Sensation Seeking and Risk Behavior. Pers Individ Dif. 2011;51(7):802-6.
  35. Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of educational research. 2006;99(6):323-38.
  36. Boyer TW, Byrnes JP. Adolescent risk-taking: Integrating personal, cognitive, and social aspects of judgment. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2009;30(1):23-33.
  37. Fischhoff B. Assessing adolescent decision-making competence. Dev Rev. 2008; 28:12-28.
  38. Bandura, A. Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press; 1977.
  39. Peterson C, Buchanan G. Explanatory style: History and evolution of the field. In, Explanatory style. Hillsdale, NJ, England. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates;
  40. Salahi EN, Izadi R. Comparing the effectiveness of Adolescent-Centered Mindfulness Therapy and Emotion Regulation Training Strategies on Risky Behaviors, Mind Wandering, and Depression in Adolescents. 2024. [Persian].
  41. Alizadeh Z, Rohani A. Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Reducing High-risk and Harmful Behaviors in Students. Sadra Medical Journal. 2023;11(4):388-400. [Persian].
Sadra Medical Journal

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 16 July 2025
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics