Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of Public Management - Decision-Making and Public Policy, Tehran University, Kish International Campus, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Economics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic, as a global challenge, necessitates effective policy responses at the national level. Considering Iran’s extensive experience with this pandemic and the diversity of measures implemented, determining and evaluating effective policies in this specific context is paramount. This study aimed to design a coherent policy package to improve Iran’s epidemic response.
Methods: This study employed a mixed-methods approach in two primary stages. The first stage involved a systematic review of literature from 2020 to 2023 to identify key policies for responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. In the second stage, these identified policies were validated and prioritized through a structured survey of 10 experts in policymaking and crisis management. Subsequently, using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method, the hierarchical and causal relationships among the policies were analyzed, culminating in the design of an integrated policy package.
Results: The findings indicated that the policies for confronting COVID-19 focused on achieving equitable access to vaccines and designing a comprehensive treatment package. They emphasized the necessity for policy flexibility to address viral mutations and for adopting a unified global approach to mitigate risks from infectious diseases. The quantitative analysis using ISM and DEMATEL revealed that among the three core policies identified, ‘Expanding Equitable Access’ and ‘Enhancing Response Flexibility’ held the strongest structural influence and were positioned at the first hierarchical level. In contrast, ‘Adopting a Unified Global Approach’ demonstrated lower influence and was placed at the second level.
Conclusion: The findings suggested that policies focused on expanding equitable access (beyond vaccines) and enhancing the flexibility of the response package served as critical prerequisites for effectively implementing a unified global approach to reduce risks from infectious diseases.
Keywords
- Karaivanov A, Lu SE, Shigeoka H, Chen C, Pamplona S. Face masks, public policies and slowing the spread of COVID-19: evidence from Canada. J Health Econ. 2021;78:102475.
- Waris A, Atta UK, Ali M, Asmat A, Baset A. COVID-19 outbreak: current scenario of Pakistan. New Microbes New Infect. 2020;35:100681.
- Zali M, Ghofrani M, Orujlu S. Nursing human resource management facing Covid-19: an integrative review. J Nurs Manag. 2022;10(4):38-48. Persian.
- Yusefi AR, Rohani Sarvestani S, Bastani P, Sharifi M, Nasabi NS, Raesi R, et al. Assessing satisfaction with COVID-19 emergency support packages in employees of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. J Mod Med Inf Sci. 2022;8(1):74-85. Persian.
- Farhadi Z, Salemi M, Jahani MA. Analysis of policy responses to COVID-19: a case study in Babol University of Medical Sciences (BUMS), Iran. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022;20(1):70-83. Persian.
- Oh J, Lee JK, Schwarz D, Ratcliffe HL, Markuns JF, Hirschhorn LR. National response to COVID-19 in the Republic of Korea and lessons learned for other countries. Health Syst Reform. 2020;6(1):e1753464.
- Olivia S, Gibson J, Nasrudin RA. Indonesia in the time of Covid-19. Bull Indones Econ Stud. 2020;56(2):143-74.
- El Zowalaty ME, Young SG, Jarhult JD. Environmental impact of the COVID-19 pandemic—a lesson for the future. Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2020;10(1):1768023.
- Sohrabi C, Alsafi Z, O’Neill N, Khan M, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, et al. World Health Organization declares global emergency: a review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int J Surg. 2020;76:71-6.
- Sy C, Ching PM, San Juan JL, Bernardo E, Miguel A, Mayol AP, et al. Systems dynamics modeling of pandemic influenza for strategic policy development: a simulation-based analysis of the COVID-19 case. Process Integr Optim Sustain. 2021;5(1):461-74.
- Weible CM, Nohrstedt D, Cairney P, Carter DP, Crow DA, Durnova AP, et al. COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives. Policy Sci. 2020;53(2):225-41.
- DeLeon P. The democratization of the policy sciences. In: The age of direct citizen participation. New York: Routledge; 2008.
- Gong F, Xiong Y, Xiao J, Lin L, Liu X, Wang D, et al. China’s local governments are combating COVID-19 with unprecedented responses—from a Wenzhou governance perspective. Front Med. 2020;14(2):220-4.
- Balmford B, Annan JD, Hargreaves JC, Altoè M, Bateman IJ. Cross-country comparisons of Covid-19: policy, politics and the price of life. Environ Resour Econ. 2020;76(4):525-51.
- Djalante R, Lassa J, Setiamarga D, Sudjatma A, Indrawan M, Haryanto B, et al. Review and analysis of current responses to COVID-19 in Indonesia: period of January to March 2020. Prog Disaster Sci. 2020;6:100091.
- Chan ASW, Ho JMC, Li JSF, Tam HL, Tang PMK. Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on psychological well-being of older chronic kidney disease patients. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:666973.
- Jones A, Watts AG, Khan SU, Forsyth J, Brown KA, Costa AP, et al. Impact of a public policy restricting staff mobility between nursing homes in Ontario, Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021;22(3):494-7.
- Rollins N, Minckas N, Jehan F, Lodha R, Raiten D, Thorne C, et al. A public health approach for deciding policy on infant feeding and mother-infant contact in the context of COVID-19. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(4):e552-7.
- Nemec J, Drechsler W, Hajnal G. Public policy during COVID-19: challenges for public administration and policy research in Central and Eastern Europe. NISPAcee J Public Adm Policy. 2020;13(2):11-22.
- Vickerman R. Will Covid-19 put the public back in public transport? A UK perspective. Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021;103:95-102.
- Yoosefi Matak HR, Salaripour AA, Ahmadi H, Saremi HR. The dialectical relationship between the city and the epidemic diseases (case study: Covid 19). J Fine Arts Archit Urban Plan. 2022;27(2):61-72.
- Lu Q, Cai Z, Chen B, Liu T. Social policy responses to the Covid-19 crisis in China in 2020. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):5896.
- Moisio S. State power and the COVID-19 pandemic: the case of Finland. Eurasian Geogr Econ. 2020;61(4):598-605.
- Henson S, Kambhampati U, Mogues T, Olsen W, Prowse M, Ramos R, et al. The development impacts of COVID-19 at home and abroad: politics and implications of government action. Eur J Dev Res. 2020;32(5):1339-52.
- Holtgrave DR, Valdiserri RO, Kalichman SC, Del Rio C, Thompson M. Core elements of a national COVID-19 strategy: lessons learned from the US National HIV/AIDS Strategy. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(12):3279-82.
- van Zandvoort K, Jarvis CI, Pearson CAB, Davies NG, CMMID COVID-19 working group, Ratnayake R, et al. Response strategies for COVID-19 epidemics in African settings: a mathematical modelling study. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):324.
- Onditi F, Obimbo M, Muchina SK, Nyadera I. Modeling a pandemic (COVID-19) management strategy for urban slums using social geometry framework. Eur J Dev Res. 2020;32(5):1450-75.
- Malmir R, Maher A, Toghiani R, Safari M. Covid-19 crisis management: reengineering the health care system in Iran. J Med Counc Iran. 2020;38(1):11-8. Persian.
- Ullah A, Pinglu C, Ullah S, Abbas HSM, Khan S. The role of e-governance in combating COVID-19 and promoting sustainable development: a comparative study of China and Pakistan. Chin Polit Sci Rev. 2021;6(1):86-118.
- Horton R. The COVID-19 catastrophe: what’s gone wrong and how to stop it happening again. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2021.
)