Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Accounting, Sirjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sirjan, Iran

10.30476/smsj.2025.102133.1512

Abstract

Introduction: Auditors serve as crucial providers of financial information to investors and corporate stakeholders. This study examined the moderating effects of internal locus of control and societal cultural dimensions on auditors’ professional judgment and professional skepticism.
Methods: This applied research employed a descriptive-correlational design, combining both field and documentary research methods. Conducted in 2023, the research aimed to explore and establish the theoretical foundations of field research methodologies. The study comprised two phases: First, a Delphi technique with targeted snowball sampling was used to interview 30 accounting and auditing experts to develop the conceptual model. Second, data were collected via researcher-developed questionnaires from auditors working at the Iranian Association of Certified Public Accountants member firms. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 21) and AMOS software.
Results: Significant relationships were found between professional judgment and ethical pressures. Ethical pressures had a significant effect on auditors’ professional judgment when moderated by internal locus of control and cultural dimensions(t>1.96, standardized factor loading>0.4, P=0.01). Similarly, ethical pressures significantly influenced professional skepticism through these moderating variables. All measured relationships demonstrated statistical significance (P=0.01).
Conclusion: The findings emphasized the importance of evaluating personality traits in auditors prior to professional certification, as these characteristics might influence professional judgment. While the absolute resolution of auditor-management conflicts remained unattainable due to inherent obstacles, the study recommended implementing measures to minimize such conflicts through enhanced awareness of these moderating factors.

Keywords

  1. Babaian A, Samani Y, Karmi Zabih E. Investigating the relationship between personality traits and Job performance of NAJA mission line employees. NAJA Human Resources Quarterly, Scientific-Promotional Journal. 2013;6(3):22-31. [Persian].
  2. Patel C, Harrison GL, McKinnon JL. Cultural influences on judgments of professional accountants in auditor–client conflict resolution. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting. 2002;13(1):1-31.
  3. Fatemi D, Hasseldine J, Hite P. The impact of professional standards on accounting judgments: The role of availability and comparative information. Research in Accounting Regulation. 2014;26(1):26-39.
  4. Sirani M, Khajawi S, Noshadi M. The effect of experience and complexity of audit issues on the auditor’s judgment. Journal of accounting and auditing reviews. 2008;16(2):35-50.
  5. Rouzbakhsh N, Davaji JG, Khozein A, Khorasani MB. The Pattern of Auditors’ Professional Ethics Immaturity in Iran Base on Grounded Theory. journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting. 2023;7(14):121-68.
  6. Nikoumram H, Roodposhti FR, Ashlaghi AT, Pourian YT. Evaluation of the impact of professional ethics of management accountants on the qualitative characteristics of management accounting information (using entropy-fuzzy technique). Manag Account. 2013;7:49-66.
  7. Hall M, Smith D, Langfield‐Smith K. Accountants’ commitment to their profession: Multiple dimensions of professional commitment and opportunities for future research. Behavioral research in accounting. 2005;17(1):89-109.
  8. Anugerah R, Sari RN, Frostiana RM, editors. The Relationship between Ethics, Expertise, Audit Experience, Fraud Risk Assessment and Audit Situational Factors and Auditor Professional Skepticism. International Symposium on Finance and Accounting. 2011;16(4):1-21.
  9. O’Callaghan S, Patel U, Walker JP, Elson RJ, Wood L, Wood D. Are auditors influenced by the attire worn by clients. A pilot study Journal of Finance and Accountancy. 2014;15(1):1-19.
  10. Nasution D. Essays on Auditor Independence, Accounting School of Business & Economics Åbo Akademi pressure on the ethical decision making of professional accountants: pressure. Accounting. Organizations and Society. 2023;26(3):135-215. [Persian].
  11. Faried A. The Study of Effectiveness of Firect, Vognitive Moral Education, Value Clarification and Combinational Methods on the Moral Judgment of Tabriz 4 Educational Zone Senior Male Students. Journal of Modern Psychological Researches. 2013;8(30):149-82.
  12. Mayer JD. Spiritual intelligence or spiritual consciousness? The international Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 2000;10(1):47-56.
  13. Smith A, Hume EC. Linking culture and ethics: A comparison of accountants’ ethical belief systems in the individualism/collectivism and power distance contexts. Journal of Business Ethics. 2005;62:209-20.
  14. Hajiha V, Mullasultani J. Investigating the relationship between emotional intelligence and analytical intelligence with the performance of auditors. Management Accounting Research Quarterly. 2016;28(9):39-53. [Persian].
  15. Clements LH, Shawver TJ. The effects of emotions on the moral judgments and intentions of accountants. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting. 2015;7(1):146-79.
  16. DARYAEI AA, Azizi A. The impact of ethics, experience and competency on audit quality (With auditors professional skepticism as a moderating variable). Financial Accounting Knowledge. 2018;5(1):79-99.
  17. Babajani J, Delavar A, Barzideh F. Identification of Components Effective on auditing professions’ social status in Iran: A social identity theory perspective. journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting. 2022;7(13):1-35.
  18. Shayesteh Shojaei P, Poorzamani Z. The Impact of Ethical standards including Ethical Environment, Professional Commitment, Ethical Values and Ethical Ideology on Performance of Auditors. Journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting. 2021;5(10):281-318.
  19. Rezalouei A, Mahdavi G. Investigating the Impact of Conformity and Obedience Pressures on Financial Managers’ Unethical Decision Making with Emphasis on the Moderating Role of Individual Characteristics. journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting. 2020;5(9):81-115.