Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Candidate in Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

10.30476/smsj.2024.100144.1446

Abstract

Introduction: As people age, they often look back on their history to determine their accomplishments and shortcomings, which might cause them to feel regret. The present study was designed to assess the reliability and validity of the Persian version of the regret scale in the Iranian elderly.
Methods: The research method was a descriptive evaluation type. The study was conducted in Tehran in 2023. The sample consisted of 293 elderly men and women, who were selected by available and online sampling methods. The elderly completed the demographic checklist, regret, psychological distress, and psychological well-being questionnaires. The psychometric properties of the regret scale were analyzed through confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient in SPSS software and R software.
Results: The content validity of the questionnaire items was found to be satisfactory in terms of quality. The results of the factor analysis indicated that the regret scale had a single-factor structure. The model had an RMSEA of 0.07 and an SRMR of 0.04, which indicated the appropriateness of the model. The calculated values of other indices (GFI, CFI, NFI, NNFI, and IFI) were 0.99, 0.96, 0.94, 0.86, and 0.96, respectively, indicating that the obtained model was acceptable. Additionally, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.81.
Conclusion: The findings indicated that the regret scale had construct validity and acceptable reliability among the Iranian elderly. Besides, the single-factor structure of this scale could help to identify regret in the Iranian elderly.

Keywords

  1. Baidwan NK, Gerberich SG, Kim H, Ryan A, Church T, Capistrant B. A longitudinal study of work-related psychosocial factors and injuries: Implications for the aging United States workforce. Am J Ind Med. 2019;62(3):212-21.
  2. Al-Rashid MA, Goh HC, Harumain YAS, Ali Z, Campisi T, Mahmood T. Psychosocial Barriers of Public Transport Use and Social Exclusion among Older Adults: Empirical Evidence from Lahore, Pakistan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;18(1).
  3. Tassone D, Reed AE, Carstensen LL. Time may heal wounds: Aging and life regrets. Psychol Aging. 2019;34(6):862-6.
  4. Tan EG, Teo I, Finkelstein EA, Meng CC. Determinants of regret in elderly dialysis patients. Nephrology. 2019;24(6):622-9.
  5. Fortunato L, Loreti A, Cortese G, Spallone D, Toto V, Cavaliere F, et al. Regret and Quality of Life After Mastectomy With or Without Reconstruction. Clin Breast Cancer. 2021;21(3):162-9.
  6. Thomas CM, Sklar MC, Su J, Xu W, de Almeida JR, Gullane P, et al. Evaluation of Older Age and Frailty as Factors Associated With Depression and Postoperative Decision Regret in Patients Undergoing Major Head and Neck Surgery. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;145(12):1170-8.
  7. Gaafar ME-S, Abd El Salam RM, El Kholy SEH. Relationship between Decision Making Styles and Life Regrets among Community Dwelling Older Adults. Alexandria Scientific Nursing Journal. 2018;20(1):1-12.
  8. Schwartz B, Ward A, Monterosso J, Lyubomirsky S, White K, Lehman DR. Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;83(5):1178-97.
  9. Patanwala M, Tieu L, Ponath C, Guzman D, Ritchie C, Kushel M. Physical, psychological, social, and existential symptoms in older homeless-experienced adults: An observational study of the hope home cohort. Journal of general internal medicine. 2018;33:635-43.
  10. Wang J, Ma X, Xu Z, Zhan J. Regret theory-based three-way decision model in hesitant fuzzy environments and its application to medical decision. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2022;30(12):5361-75.
  11. Marcatto F, Ferrante D. The regret and disappointment scale: An instrument for assessing regret and disappointment in decision making. Judgment and Decision Making. 2008;3(1):87-99.
  12. Jedrzejewski BY, Marsiglio MC, Guerriero J, Penkin A, Connelly KJ, Berli JU, et al. Regret after Gender-Affirming Surgery: A Multidisciplinary Approach to a Multifaceted Patient Experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;152(1):206-14.
  13. Szproch AK, Maguire R. A systematic review of the factors associated with regret post-cancer treatment. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 2022;40(1):1-25.
  14. Nallani R, Smith JB, Penn JP, Bur AM, Kakarala K, Shnayder Y, et al. Decision regret 3 and 6 months after treatment for head and neck cancer: Observational study of associations with clinicodemographics, anxiety, and quality of life. Head Neck. 2022;44(1):59-70.
  15. Buchanan J, Summerville A, Lehmann J, Reb J. The Regret Elements Scale: Distinguishing the affective and cognitive components of regret. Judgment and Decision making. 2016;11(3):275-86.
  16. Liu Z, Li L, Liu S, Sun Y, Li S, Yi M, et al. Reduced feelings of regret and enhanced fronto-striatal connectivity in elders with long-term Tai Chi experience. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020;15(8):861-73.
  17. Braude L, Kirsten L, Gilchrist J, Juraskova I. A systematic review of women’s satisfaction and regret following risk-reducing mastectomy. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(12):2182-9.
  18. Safdar I, Ghayas S, Khawaja AO, Akhatr ST. Construction and validation of Life Regrets Scale for elderly people in Pakistani culture. BPA-Applied Psychology Bulletin (Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata). 2020;68(288).
  19. Alibabaee Z, Aminjafari Dehagani B. The impact of consultation with a positive approach on prosperity, psychological well-being, and happiness in patients with multiple sclerosis. Sadra Medical Journal. 2020;8(3):207-20. [Persian].
  20. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB. Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson; 2013.
  21. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335-43.
  22. Montazeri S, Aghaei Jashoghani A, Golparvar M. Comparison of the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral management based on mindfulness and treatment based on acceptance and commitment on psychological well-being in multiple sclerosis patients. Sadra Medical Journal. 2018;7(1):59-74. [Persian].
  23. Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1989;57(6):1069.
  24. Ryff CD. Psychological well-being revisited: advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychother Psychosom. 2014;83(1):10-28.
  25. Sheykhangafshe FB, Shabahang R. Prediction of psychological wellbeing of elderly people based on spirituality, social support, and optimism. Journal of Religion & Health. 2020;7:22-32. [Persian].
  26. Hallquist MN, Wright AGC, Molenaar PCM. Problems with Centrality Measures in Psychopathology Symptom Networks: Why Network Psychometrics Cannot Escape Psychometric Theory. Multivariate Behav Res. 2021;56(2):199-223.
  27. Barrett P. Structural equafion modelling: Adjudging model fit–Personality and individual differences. London: McGraw-Hill; 2007;42(5):815-24.
  28. Alexopoulos D, Kalaitzidis I. Psychometric properties of Eysenck personality questionnaire-revised (EPQ-R) short scale in Greece. Personality and individual Differences. 2004;37(6):1205-20.
  29. Tsai H-WJ, Cebula K, Fletcher-Watson S. Influences on the psychosocial adjustment of siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder in Taiwan and the United Kingdom. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2016;32:115-29.
  30. Cho G, Hwang H, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. Cutoff criteria for overall model fit indexes in generalized structured component analysis. Journal of marketing analytics. 2020;8(4):189-202.
  31. Ong MHA, Puteh F. Quantitative data analysis: Choosing between SPSS, PLS, and AMOS in social science research. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Scientific Research. 2017;3(1):14-25.
  32. Helms JE, Henze KT, Sass TL, Mifsud VA. Treating Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients as data in counseling research. The counseling psychologist. 2006;34(5):630-60.