Sadra Medical Journal

Loneliness, Marital Attitudes, and Their Impact on Mate Selection Criteria Among Students in Shiraz

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Saeed Mokhtari Masoumi Alamdarloo 1
Hamidreza Zakeri 2

1 MSc student in Clinical Psychology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Instructor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Economics and management, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran

https://doi.org/10.30476/smsj.2024.98769.1411
Abstract
Introduction: Mate selection is one of the most significant decisions that individuals make in their lifetime. This study aimed to predict mate selection criteria based on loneliness and marital attitudes among students in Shiraz.
Methods: This research employed a descriptive design. The statistical population comprised all students of the Islamic Azad University of Shiraz branch in 2022. A sample of 377 individuals (235 women and 142 men) was selected using a step-by-step cluster sampling method. The short form of the Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale for Adults (SELSA-S), the Marital Attitude Scale (MAS), and the Mate Selection Criteria Inventory (MSCI) were used for evaluation.
Results: The findings were analyzed using the multiple regression method simultaneously, which showed that a realistic attitude towards marriage and socio-emotional loneliness were significant predictors of mate selection criteria. Furthermore, the step-by-step multiple regression analysis revealed that a realistic attitude toward marriage had greater predictive power.
Conclusion: A realistic attitude towards marriage leads to the selection of wise criteria and a more logical perspective in mate selection. Individuals with a more realistic attitude towards marriage examine this issue from different aspects and strive to have more logical and balanced criteria for marriage.

Keywords

Loneliness
Students
Psychology
Marriage
Mate selection criteria
  1. Fiskin G, Sari E. Evaluation of the relationship between youth attitudes towards marriage and motivation for childbearing. Children and Youth Services Review. 2021;121:105856.
  2. Willoughby BJ, Olson CD, Carroll JS, Nelson LJ, Miller RB. Sooner or later? The marital horizons of parents and their emerging adult children. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2012;29(7):967-81.
  3. Fouladiyan M, Hashemi SZ, Teimouri M. Comparative Analysis of the Criteria for Choosing A Lifelong Partner Among Different Social Groups in Iran’s Contemporary Society. Two Quarterly Journal of Contemporary Sociological Research. 2019;7(13):91-122. [In Persian].
  4. Isanejad O, Hooshmand S. Factor structure, validity and reliability of Mate Selection Criteria Inventory (MSCI) in an Iranian sample. Journal of family research. 2019;14(3):327-44. [In Persian].
  5. APA [Internet]. Dictionairy of Psychology. (c2022). Available from: https://dictionary.apa.org/psychological-factors
  6. Buecker S, Maes M, Denissen JJ, Luhmann M. Loneliness and the Big Five personality traits: A meta–analysis. European Journal of Personality. 2020;34(1):8-28. doi: 10.1002/per.2229.
  7. Mombeini I, Bereyhi HB. Life Satisfaction in the Elderly: The Role of Mental Health and Loneliness. Psychology. 2022;8(3):287-98. [In Persian].
  8. Landmann H, Rohmann A. When loneliness dimensions drift apart: Emotional, social and physical loneliness during the COVID-19 lockdown and its associations with age, personality, stress and well-being. Int J Psychol. 2022;57(1):63-72.
  9. Mehrandish N, Salimi BH, Naeimi E. The Components of Loneliness of Teenage Girls Based on Their Lived Experiences. QJCR 2019;18(70):4-34. [In Persian].
  10. Kithuka Y. Gender Differences in Marital Attitudes, Expectations and Intentions to Marry in Two Universities in Nairobi. Kenya: United States International University-Africa;
  11. Willoughby BJ, Carroll JS. Sexual experience and couple formation attitudes among emerging adults. Journal of adult development. 2010;17:1-11.
  12. Keldal G, Atli A. Predictors of Turkish University students’ marital attitudes. Current Psychology. 2020;39:1354-61.
  13. Nilforoshan P, Navidian A, Abedi A. Studying the psychometric properties of marital attitude scale. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2013;1(1):35-47. [In Persian].
  14. Saqqezi A, YazdaniEsfidvajani H, Sarallahi F. Comparison of the marital attitude based on the severity of mind wandering in single students. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal (RRJ). 2020;9(10):9-16.
  15. Roshani S. The Role of Parents’ Marital Interactions and Their Marriage-Related Education in the Prediction of Children’s Attitude to Marriage. 2022. [In Persian].
  16. Rezaeeian Z. Consequences of wrong choice of spouse. Rahtooshe, 2020;1(1):7-17. [In Persian].
  17. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement. 1970;30(3):607-10.
  18. DiTommaso E, Brannen C, Best LA. Measurement and validity characteristics of the short version of the social and emotional loneliness scale for adults. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2004;64(1):99-119.
  19. Jowkar B. Psychometric properties of the short form of the social and emotional loneliness scale for adults (SELSA-S). International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2012;5(4):311-7. [In Persian].
  20. Braaten EB, Rosén LA. Development and validation of the Marital Attitude Scale. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 1998;29(3-4):83-91.
  21. Schwarz S, Hassebrauck M. Sex and age differences in mate-selection preferences. Hum Nat. 2012;23(4):447-66.
  22. Yazdani F, Shafiabadiy A, Heidari H. Predictions based on marital stability mate selection criteria, communication skills and family resiliency. 2020;4(1):69-78. [In Persian].
  23. Refahi Z, Sanai ZB, Shafiabadi A, Sharifi HP. The comparative study of the criteria for spouse selection under two circumstances (at the beginning of marriage and present time) on a sample husband and wives in Shiraz. Counseling Research and Development, 2010;9(33):7-31. [In Persian].
  24. Lapierre MA. Smartphones and loneliness in love: Testing links between smartphone engagement, loneliness, and relational health. Psychology of Popular Media. 2020;9(2):125.
  25. Van Groenou MB, de Jong-Gierveld J. Quality of marriage and social loneliness in later life. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research: Springer; p. 5309-12.
  26. Sønderby LC, Wagoner B. Loneliness: An integrative approach. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences. 2013;3(1):1-29.
  27. Chen R. A Cross-Cultural Study of Never-Married Chinese and American Adults’ Mate Selection Perceptions and Criteria: Virginia Tech;
  28. Khoei AA, Zahrakar K, Ahmady K. The Effectiveness of Premarital Education based on the Prevention and Relationship Enhancement Program (PREP) on Communication Beliefs and Attitudes Toward Marriage of Couples on the Verge of Marriage. Journal of Islamic Life Style Centeredon Health. 2021;10(4):63-73. [In Persian].
  29. Ebrahimi N, Koraei A, Abbaspour Z, Shahbazi M. The Effects of Dimensions of Individual Identity on Attitude towards Marriage through Mediating Elements of Marital Horizons among Single Female Postgraduate Students. Women Studies. 2020;11(31):1-24. [In Persian].
  30. Saqqezi A, Gol Mohammadian M. The mediating role of Love Styles in the relationship between emotional and social loneliness and Desire for Marriage in College female Student. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal (RRJ). 2021;10(6):107-16. [In Persian].
  31. Harris R. ACT with love: Stop struggling, reconcile differences, and strengthen your relationship with acceptance and commitm: New Harbinger Publications;
  32. Knox D, Schacht C. Choices in relationships: An introduction to marriage and the family. 10th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2009.
Sadra Medical Journal
Volume 12, Issue 3
Summer 2024
Pages 431-444

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Guide for Reviewers

Contact Us