Sadra Medical Journal

Attitudes of Infertile Women towards Surrogacy in Infertility Clinics of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

H Mahmoodian 1
N Saboorian 2
P Nabeiei 3

1 Instractor, Department of Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 General Physician, Faculty of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3 Educational Expert, Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract
Background: Infertility is one of the important issues related to reproductive health, which can cause a lot of problems in family life. Assisted reproductive techniques have played an important role in treatment of infertility during the past three decades. One of these methods is surrogacy, which has caused many challenges in relationships and personal lives of those involved. This study aimed to investigate the attitude of infertile women towards surrogacy and its probable challenges.
Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on 160 infertile women referring to Shahid Motahari clinic in Shiraz selected through convenience sampling. The study data were collected using a 20-item questionnaire that assessed infertile women’s challenges and concerns about surrogacy. Finally, the data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical software, version 14.
Results: The results showed that 72.5% of the infertile women had negative attitudes and the rest had positive attitudes towards surrogacy. Indeed, the women’s main concerns about using this method were incompatibility with culture and religion, child’s potential problems, surrogate mother’s probable abuse, threats to relationship with one’s husband, and decreased sense of belonging to the child.
Conclusion: The study results showed that nearly two thirds of the women had negative attitudes towards surrogacy. The main concerns included incompatibility with culture and religion, child’s potential problems, surrogate mother’s probable abuse, threats to relationship with one’s husband, and decreased sense of belonging to the child. Therefore, educational workshops are recommended to be held to improve women’s attitudes towards this issue.

Keywords

Alternative uterus
Infertility clinic
Infertile women
Ethical challenges
  1. Pazandeh F, Sharghi Some’e N, Karami Noori R, Alavi Majd H. Investigating the relationship between infertility and well-being and satisfaction of marriage. Pajouhandeh Journal 2004; 9(42): 9-15. (Persian)
  2. Berek JS, Novak E. Berek and Novak's gynecology. 14th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2011. P: 1671.
  3. Steinbock B. Payment for egg donation and surrogacy. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 2004; 71(4):255-65.
  4. Wang Y, Dean J, Badgery-Parker T, Sullivan E. Assisted reproduction technology in Australia and New Zealand 2006. [Last Cited on 2011 Jun 07]; Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Perinatal Statistics Unit (2008) Available at: http://www.preru.unsw.edu.au/PRERUWeb.nsf/resources/ART_2005_06/$file/art12+web+tables.pdf.
  5. Sills ES, Healy CM. Building Irish families through surrogacy: Medical and judicial issues for the advanced reproductive technologies. Reprod Health 2008; 5:9.
  6. Yousefi H, Ghahari Sh. Alternative Uterus: A Look at Different Aspects and Challenges. Fertility and Infertility 2009; 9(2): 137-42. (Persian)
  7. Fazli Kholf Z, Shafie Abadi A, Tarahomi M. Psychological Aspects of Pregnancy by Alternative Uterus in Host Women. Fertility and Infertility. 2009; 9(1): 43-9. )Persian(
  8. Utian WH, Goldfarb JM, Kiwi R, Sheean LA, Auld H, Lisbona H. Perliminary experience with in vitro fertilization surrogate gestational pregnancy. Fertile Steril 1989; 52:633-8.
  9. PooteAE, Van Den Akker OB. British woman's attitudes to surrogacy. Hum Reprod 2009; 24(1):139-45.
  10. Ahmari Tehran H, Jafar Beiglou E, Heidar Pour A, Ziae Sheikh Al-Eslami N, Abedini Z. A survey on the attitude of infertile Iranian women toward alternative womb. Iranian Journal of Ethics and Medical History 2010; 4(1): 62-70. (Persian)
  11. Kilic S, Ucar M, Yaren H, Gulec M, Atac A, Demirel F, et al. Determination of the attitudes of Turkish infertile women toward surrogacy and oocyte donation. Pak J Med Sci 2009; 25:36–40.
  12. Seif D, Alborzi Sh, Alborzi S. The Impact of Some Emotional and Demographic Factors on the Satisfaction of Infertile Women from Life. Fertility and Infertility 2001; 2(8): 66-72. (Persian)
  13. HibinoA,Nagata M. Biothecnology in JapanesmediA: Comparative analysis of newspaper articles on genetic engineering in Japan and Europe. Asian Journal of Social Psycology 2006; 9:12-23.
  14. Sohrabvand F, Jafarabadi M. Knowledge and attitudes of infertile couples about assistedreproductive technology. Iran J Reprod Med 2005; 3:90–4.
  15. Allahbakhshian L, Gholizade L, Hasankhani H, Sattarzadeh N, Sheykhalipour Z, et el. Gestational surrogacy: Viewpoint of Iranian infertile women. Hum Reprod Sci 2011; 4(3): 138–42.
  16. Baykal B, Korkmaz C, Ceyhan ST, Goktolga U, Baser I. Opinions of infertile Turkish women on gamete donation and gestational surrogacy. Fertil Stril 2008; 89(4):817-22.
  17. Jadva V, Murray C, Lycett E, MacCallum F, Golombok S. Surrogacy: The experiences of surrogate mothers. Hum Reprod 2003; 18:2196–204
  18. Genuis SJ, Chang WC, Genuis SK. Public attitudes in Edmonton toward assisted reproductive technology. CMAJ 1993; 149:153–61.
Sadra Medical Journal
Volume 5, Issue 3
Summer 2017
Pages 131-140

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Guide for Reviewers

Contact Us