نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد روانشناسی بالینی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد ارسنجان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ارسنجان، ایران

2 دکترای تخصصی روانشناسی، بیمارستان اعصاب و روان شیراز، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شیراز، شیراز، ایران

3 استادیار جراح عمومی و فلوشیپ جراحی سرطان، مرکز تحقیقات بیماری های پستان، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شیراز، شیراز، ایران

4 استاد تمام جراحی عمومی و فلوشیپ جراحی سرطان، مرکز تحقیقات بیماری های پستان،دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شیراز، شیراز، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: بسیاری از زنان مبتلا به سرطان پستان از مشکلات روان‌شناختی که با سرطان همایند است، رنج می‌برند و بهزیستی روان‌شناختی این بیماران روزبه‌روز در حال کاهش است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف مقایسه‌ی اجتناب ‌شناختی، عدم تحمل‌ بلاتکلیفی و تنظیم هیجان در زنان مبتلا به سرطان پستان و فاقد سرطان شهر شیراز انجام گرفت.
روش­ها: روش پژوهش توصیفی از نوع علّی‌مقایسه‌ای بوده است. جامعه‌ی آماری پژوهش را دو گروه زنان مبتلا به سرطان پستان مراجعه‌کننده به درمانگاه شهید مطهری به شیوه‌ی در دسترس (100نفر) و زنان فاقد سرطان مراجعه‌کننده به مدارس ابتدایی ناحیه‌ی دو شیراز به شیوه‌ی در دسترس (100 نفر) تشکیل دادند که پرسش‌نامه‌های «اجتناب شناختی سکستون و دوگاس»، «عدم تحمل بلاتکلیفی فریستون و همکاران» و «تنظیم هیجان گارنفسکی و کرایج» را تکمیل کردند. داده‌ها با استفاده از آزمون تحلیل واریانس چندمتغیری تجزیه و تحلیل شدند.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد بین گروه زنان مبتلا به سرطان پستان و فاقد سرطان در مؤلفه‌های اجتناب شناختی (029/0P<)، عدم تحمل بلاتکلیفی (0001/0P<) و تنظیم هیجان (046/0P<) تفاوت معنادار وجود دارد.
نتیجه‌گیری: بر اساس یافته‌های به‌دست‌آمده می‌توان گفت بین متغیرهای اجتناب شناختی، عدم تحمل بلاتکلیفی و تنظیم هیجان در زنان مبتلا به سرطان پستان و فاقد سرطان تفاوت وجود دارد؛ از این‌رو شناسایی این عوامل روان‌شناختی و نقش آن‌ها در زنان مبتلا به سرطان پستان می‌تواند زمینه‌ی لازم را برای کاهش مشکلات زنانی که به این بیماری مبتلا هستند، فراهم کند.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Cognitive Avoidance, Intolerance of Uncertainty and Emotion Regulation in Women with and without Breast Cancer

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mozhde Riazi 1
  • Samad Fereidooni 2
  • Vahid Zangouri 3
  • Abdolrasoul Talei 4

1 M.A. Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Arsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan, Iran

2 Ph.D. in Psychology, Shiraz psychiatric hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3 MD, Assistant Professor of General Surgery (Fellowship of Oncosurgery), Breast Diseases Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

4 MD, Professor of General Surgery (Fellowship of Oncosurgery), Breast Diseases Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Many women with breast cancer suffer from the psychological problems associated with cancer, and the patients' psychological well-being is deteriorating daily. This study aimed to compare cognitive avoidance, intolerance of uncertainty, and emotion regulation in women with and without breast cancer.
Methods: The research method was causal-comparative. The statistical population of this study was all patients with non-metastatic breast cancer referred to the Shahid Motahari clinic, selected by the convenience sampling method (n=100). Also, all women referring to primary schools in District 2 of Shiraz during the same two-month period were selected as cancer-free and healthy women (n=100) for comparison with the group of women with breast cancer. The data were collected by Sexton and Dougas’s Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire, Freestone, Ryuma, Retarte, Dogas, and Ladosaur’s Intolerance and Ambiguity Questionnaire, and Garnfski and Craig’s short questionnaire of Cognitive Emotion Regulation. Data were analyzed using (MANOVA).
Results: The results showed a significant difference between women with breast cancer and without cancer in the components of cognitive avoidance (P<0/029), intolerance of uncertainty (P<0/0001), and emotion regulation (P<0/046).
Conclusion:  Findings showed a difference between cognitive avoidance variables, intolerance of uncertainty, and emotion regulation in women with breast cancer and those without cancer. Therefore, identifying psychological factors and their role in women with breast cancer help reduce the problems of women with breast cancer.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Breast cancer
  • Cognitive avoidance
  • Emotion regulation
  • Intolerance of uncertainty
  • Women
  1. Nourizadeh R, Mogaddam Tabrizi F, Vahdati S. Development and Psychometric Testing of an Instrument to Measure Determinants of Mammography. Payesh. 2017; 16 (5), 603-612.
  2. Fong, A. J., Scarapicchia, T. M., McDonough, M. H., Wrosch, C., & Sabiston, C. M. Changes in social support predict emotional well‐being in breast cancer survivors. Psycho‐2017; 26(5), 664-671.
  3. Taghvaie, D., Masjedi, A., & Jafari, M. Effectiveness of dialectical treatment on rebuke of oneself and others, rumination and catastrophizing of women with breast cancer. Thoughts and Behavior in Clinical Psychology.2015; 9(35), 67-76.
  4. Mirzaie K, Abdollahi M. H, Shahgholian M. The Relationship between Metacognitive Beliefs, Social Anxiety and Shyness: The Role of Emotion Regulation Strategies.roh. 2014; 7 (2), 13-22.
  5. Feldman-Barrett, L., Gross, sh J., Christensen, T.C., & Benvenuto, M. Knowing what you're feeling and knowing what to do about it: mapping the relation between emotion differentiation and emothion regulation. Cognition and Emotion.2001; 15(5), 713-724.
  6. Gross, J. J. Wise emotion regulation. In: L. Feldma-Barrett & P. Salovey (Eds.), the wisdom in feeling. New York: The Guilford Press.2002; 3(1), 297-318.
  7. Narimani M, Abbasi M, Abolghasemi A, Ahadi B. A study Comparing the effectiveness of acceptance/commitment by emotional regulation training on adjustment in students with dyscalculia. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2013; 2 (4), 154-176.
  8. Gratz K. L., & Gunderson J.G. Preliminary Data on an Acceptance-Based Emotion Regulation Group Intervention for Deliberate Self-Harm Among Women with Borderline Personality Disorder. Behav Therapy.2006; 37(1), 25–35.
  9. Diefendorff J.M., Richard E.M., Yang J. Linking emotion regulation strategies to affective events and negative emotions at work. Journal of Vocational Behavior.2008; 73(20), 498–508.
  10. Dugas M. J., Schewartz A., Francis K. Intolerance of uncertainty, worry, and depression. Journal of Cognitive ther res.2004; 28, 835–842.
  11. Buher K, Dugas M. J. The intolerance of uncertainty scale: Psychometric properties of the English version. Journal of Behav Res Ther.2002; 40, 931–945.
  12. Fergus T. A., Rowatt W. C. Intolerance of uncertainty and personality: Experiential permeability is associated with difficulties tolerating uncertainty. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences.2014; 58,128–131.
  13. Wells A. Emotional disorders and metacognition: Innovative cognitive therapy. John Wiley & Sons. 2002.
  14. Ottenbreit N. D., Dobson K. S. Avoidance and depression: the construction of the cognitive-behavioral avoidance scale. Behavioral Research Therapy.2004; 42(3):293‒ 313.
  15. Sexton, K. A. & Dugas, M. J. The cognitive avoidance questionare: Vlidetion of the english translation. Journal of Anxiety Disorder.2008; 22, 235-370.
  16. Sexston, K. A., Dugas, M. J. An investigation of the factors leading to cognitive avoidance in worry. Poster presented at the annual convention of the association for advancement of behavior therapy, New Orleans, LA.2004.
  17. Bassak-Nejad S, Moeini N, Mehrabizadeh Honarmand M. The relationship between post event processing and cognitive avoidance with social anxiety among students. Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2010; 4 (4), 335-340.
  18. Freeston M. H, Rheauma J, Litarte H, Dugas, M. J, Ladouceur R. Why Do People Worry. Journal of Personality and Individual Difference.1994; 17, 791–802.
  19. MahmudAliloo M, Shahjooee T, Hashemi Z. Comparison of Intolerance of Uncertainty, Negative Orientation, Cognitive Avoidance, Positive Beliefs about Worries in Patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Control Group. Scientific journal of modern psychological research. 2010; 5, (20), 167-185.
  20. Garnefski N , Kraaij V. Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire “development of a short 18-item version (CERQ-short). Personality and Individual Differences2006; 41(6) 1045-1053.
  21. Hasani, J. The reliability and validity of the short form of the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire. RBS. 2011; 9 (4), 229-240.
  22. Zemestani, M. A comparative study on Intolerance of Uncertainty, Emotion Regulation, and Cognitive Avoidance in Patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Healthy People. IJPN.2019; 7 (1): 9-17.
  23. Mokhtari S, Khosravi S, NejatBakhsh A. Comparison of intolerance of uncertainty, Worriness, Cognitive Avoidance, negative problem orientation among people with generalized anxiety disorder, major depression disorder and normal subjects(population). RBS.2015; 13 (2), 188-207.
  24. Tan H. J, Marks L. S, Hoyt M. A, Kwan L, Filson C. P, Macairan M., ... & Stanton A. L. The relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and anxiety in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. The Journal of urology.2016; 195(6), 1724-1730.
  25. Esnaashari Sh, Mohammadkhani Sh, Hassanabadi H. R. Cognitive model of anxiety in cancer patients: The role of cognitive and metacognitive components. Health Psychology. 2017; 6 (21), 66-85.
  26. Majdy N, Atadokht A, Hazrati S, Sobhi Gharamaleki N. Comparison Brain/Behavioral Systems and Emotion Regulation Difficulties in Students with and Without Social Anxiety Disorder Clinical Syndromes. Scientific Journal of Clinical Psychology & Personality.2019; 17(1), 165-174.
  27. Tashkeh M, Davazdahemami M. H, Bakhtiyari M, Jafari M. Comparision of intolerance of uncertainty and difficulties in emotion regulation in individuals with Body Dysmorphic and Social Anxiety. Health Psychology.2018; 3 (27), 32-45.